Automated Negotiation and Semantic Brokering with Intelligent Agents Using Defeasible Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
E-Commerce describes the revolution that is currently transforming the way business is conducted, through the use of information technology, and in particular the World Wide Web. Brokering and negotiation are fundamental stages of e-Commerce. The last few years, there has been an increasing interest for the automation of these two stages. This is partially achieved by the use of software agents. As machines start to engage in business processes, information must be organized in such a way that is accessible by both humans and machines. Additionally, machines must be able to access, process and interpret the information in the same way. Semantic Web vision promises to handle these new issues. Electronic Brokering is a good candidate for taking up Semantic Web technology. We study the brokering or matchmaking problem that is, how a requester’s requirements and preferences can be matched against a set of offerings collected by a broker. The proposed solution uses the Semantic Web standard of RDF to represent the offerings, and defeasible logic, which is based on non-monotonic reasoning, for expressing the requirements and preferences. We motivate and explain the approach we propose, and report on a prototypical implementation of a semantic brokering system, exhibiting the described functionality, in JADE multi-agent environment. Expression of negotiation strategies is also of great importance in e-Commerce procedure. We exploit the use of defeasible logic for expressing negotiation strategies. We also implement a negotiating logicbased agent architecture in JADE multi-agent environment.
منابع مشابه
A Visual Environment for Developing Defeasible Rule Bases for the Semantic Web
Defeasible reasoning is a rule-based approach for efficient reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information. Such reasoning is useful for many applications in the Semantic Web, such as policies and business rules, agent brokering and negotiation, ontology and knowledge merging, etc., mainly due to interesting features, such as conflicting rules and priorities of rules. However, the RuleM...
متن کاملA Graphical Rule Authoring Tool for Defeasible Reasoning in the Semantic Web
Defeasible reasoning is a rule-based approach for efficient reasoning with incomplete and inconsistent information. Such reasoning is useful for many applications in the Semantic Web, such as policies and business rules, agent brokering and negotiation, ontology and knowledge merging, etc. However, the syntax of defeasible logic may appear too complex for many users. In this paper we present a ...
متن کاملA System for Automated Agent Negotiation with Defeasible Logic-Based Strategies - Preliminary Report
This paper reports on a system for automated agent negotiation. The negotiation strategies are expressed in defeasible logic, and are applied using the implemented reasoning system DR-DEVICE. The overall system architecture is described, and a particular 1-1 negotiation scenario is presented in detail.
متن کاملA Context-aware Architecture for Mental Model Sharing through Semantic Movement in Intelligent Agents
Recent studies in multi-agent systems are paying increasingly more attention to the paradigm of designing intelligent agents with human inspired concepts. One of the main cognitive concepts driving the core of many recent approaches in multi agent systems is shared mental models. In this paper, we propose an architecture for sharing mental models based on a new concept called semantic movement....
متن کاملDefeasible Logic for Automated Negotiation∗
Negotiation plays a fundamental role in e-commerce. In this paper, the application of defeasible logic for automated negotiation is investigated. Defeasible logic is flexible enough to be adapted to several possible negotiation strategies, has efficient implementations, and provides a formal basis for analysis (e.g. to explain why a negotiation was not successful). Two case studies, one small a...
متن کامل